A Corentyne, Berbice, Region Six (East Berbice-Corentyne) cattle farmer is accusing Police of conspiring with stray catchers in the region. The woman was forced to pay almost $400,000 to have her cattle released from the pound at the Number 51 Police Station. The farmer claimed that her animals were impounded even though she had a document giving her permission to graze the cattle in the rice cultivation area. The farmer claimed that at the end of each rice crop the Water Users Association grants permission for cattle owners to graze cattle in the cultivation area. This is usually for a two-week period.Ludmila Judistit watches her cattle being released after paying $344,400Ludmila Judistit, the 49-year-old cattle framer, told Guyana Times that on Tuesday last, her employee was grazing cattle at Number Naught when he was approached by the stray catchers.According to her, when the stray catchers started rounding up the cattle, they were told that he was there with the animals. She related that the young man showed the pass to the stray catchers and they told him that the pass was not valid. A copy of the pass was shown to this publication. The document states that the woman was granted permission by the Number 52/74 Waters Users Association to graze 80 heads of cattle within the Number Naught and Number 55 area.According to her, the impounders took the cattle to the Number 51 Police Station Pound. On their way there, they had to pass another animal pound which falls under the Neighbourhood Democratic Council and provides water and grass for impounded animals, unlike the pound at the Police Station.According to Judistit, a mother of two, when she got to the Number 51 Police Station, the stray catcher was still there and was engaging a Policeman. She said she approached and saw him showing his license to impound stray animals.“‘I take out the paper and show the Policeman that I have permission to graze the cows there. I told him that the Water Users Association gave me permission and the Sergeant did not even take the paper to look at it. He told me that the man has a paper to impound the cows,” the former teacher, now farmer, said.The woman claimed it is for that reason that she suspects there is collusion between officers at the station and the stray catchers.On Thursday last, she paid $344,400 plus an additional fee for the days the animals were impounded. The farmer said she has since raised the matter with Police Commissioner Lesley James and Deputy Commissioner Paul Williams. (Andrew Carmichael)
AD Quality Auto 360p 720p 1080p Top articles1/5READ MOREPettersson scores another winner, Canucks beat KingsAll these “volunteers” did private business on public time with their bosses’ approval. But because the city doesn’t actually have any standards for monitoring such practices, we can’t know for sure how many taxpayer hours were lost. For that matter, we can’t even know for sure that the city workers actually showed up for their “volunteer” duty and didn’t just use the opportunity to cash in on a free holiday. And because the city has no protocols for deciding which charities should benefit from the taxpayers’ largesse this way, there’s no way to ensure that favoritism didn’t play a role. Are all charities eligible for free assistance, or just those with high-profile events led by ex-presidents? Yes, one can argue – as various city officials already have – that these workers contributed to a worthy cause, and that’s all that should matter. But there are a lot of worthy causes that taxpayers might wish to support, and not least among them is the legitimate business of the city of Los Angeles. City leaders swear this “volunteer” work won’t affect the city’s bottom line – no essential duties were affected. But such statements only confirm what we’ve long suspected: There are far too many people in city government doing too little work as it is. Few private-sector businesses could afford to lose 14 employees from one office for a day or more and not be seriously affected. Perhaps the city employees who are so unburdened by their jobs that they can feel free to “volunteer” their paid time elsewhere should “volunteer” to remove themselves from the public payroll. Then they really would be doing the public a service, without costing the public a dime.160Want local news?Sign up for the Localist and stay informed Something went wrong. Please try again.subscribeCongratulations! You’re all set! `TIS the season for volunteering. Each November, as Thanksgiving stirs our hearts to gratitude, many of us turn to service to others, offering time, treasure and talent for those who are less fortunate. Throughout Los Angeles, and especially here in the San Fernando Valley, we know a thing or two about volunteering. But it’s nothing like the sort of “volunteering” that’s been taking place out of City Hall. No, the sort of volunteering we’re familiar with entails giving up one’s time or money for the joy of lending a hand to those who need one. But City Hall’s style of “volunteering” is altogether different. It involves the highest-paid municipal workers in the nation leaving city work undone and putting in time (allegedly) at a charitable site, while drawing their taxpayer salaries for their efforts. In late October, when former President Jimmy Carter came to Los Angeles to promote a Habitat for Humanity Project in South L.A., some 31 employees of the city’s Housing Department ditched work – but were still paid – to lend a hand. So did 14 members of City Councilwoman Janice Hahn’s staff.