Researchers react to Chinas twochild policy move

first_img Email Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe The announcement was not unexpected, says Zeng Yi, a demographer at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, and the director of Peking University’s Center for Healthy Aging and Development. In 2013 and again this past April, China’s National Development and Reform Commission, a high-level policy-making body, had included  in a key publication papers Zeng authored that advocated quick adoption of a two-child policy. And in 2013 the government rolled out a new policy that allowed couples to have two children when one parent was an only child. Those moves followed longtime criticism of the one-child policy from international human rights and religious groups, and tensions over its enforcement within China.Many China-born scholars and former officials had been advocating for the policy’s abolition for years. One issue they highlighted was a sex-ratio imbalance: China’s 2010 census found that 118 boys were born for every 100 girls—a gap that stayed nearly steady from 2000, when the census found 117 boys per 100 girls.The researchers also argued that China’s fertility rate had dropped to potentially problematic levels for a nation with a rapidly aging population and shrinking workforce. By comparing official statistics to school registration records and other data, they concluded that China’s birth rate had dropped to 1.5 children per woman in 2010—much lower than the 1.77 figure the government claimed. Analysts say the government presented the higher figure in order to provide a justification for the one-child policy.Other researchers have pursued studies suggesting that many Chinese now prefer small families. An early survey of thousands of women in Jiangsu province, for example, found that relatively few were ready to take advantage of an early policy exception in the province that allowed some couples to have two-child families. One child was best, some 55% of women eligible to have two children told surveyors.Those results reflect the fact that “the costs of childbearing is very high,” Zeng wrote in an email. A preference for fewer children is “widely prevalent in all urban areas and quite many rural areas,” he adds.At this point, Cai says, the factors convincing couples to have children “are more structural and cultural” than policy-driven. Still, he adds, abolishing the policy sends an important message and will help ease tension within Chinese society: “It is a liberating step.”Other researchers have set out to quantify the one-child policy’s more intangible effects on Chinese society. In a paper published in Science in January 2013, Lisa Cameron of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, and co-authors used games developed by experimental economists to estimate the degree to which the policy has shaped the personalities of what some dub the “little emperor” generation. The researchers found that study participants who became only children because of the policy were less trustworthy and less conscientious than others, even after controlling for factors like gender and education. The policy shift may have a “modest effect in the short term” on the birth rate, says Wang Feng, a demographer at the University of California, Irvine. But its long-term impact on population trends like aging will be “mostly unnoticeable,” he predicts. China’s mortality rate is low, Zeng notes, and a baby boom generation born during the 1950s and 1960s, when Mao Zedong encouraged couples to have many children, will age in the next few decades, keeping China’s overall population relatively old.center_img Researchers aren’t surprised by yesterday’s announcement that China’s government will abandon its longstanding one-child policy. And although demographers predict the new two-baby allowance will have just a modest near-term impact on the nation’s demographics, they say it could bring social and political benefits.China’s government will be “actively taking steps to counter the aging of the population,” the Xinhua state news agency reported Thursday in announcing the move, which followed discussions among Communist Party leaders about China’s forthcoming 5-year development plan. Demographers had long urged the change, pointing to China’s rapidly aging population, along with a surplus of tens of millions of males caused by sex-selective abortion. The announcement is “long overdue,” wrote Yong Cai, a demographer at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, in an email. “This is probably the easiest reform program that the Chinese Communist Party could push out—with virtually no political risk, but with enormous social benefits.” Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*)last_img read more